Toward an exploration of follower's implicit followership theories of Mashhad's large organizations using a qualitative approach

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

1 Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Binaloud Higher Education Institute, Mashhad, Iran

2 Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Followership is a developing paradigm in organizational behavior which focuses
mainly on followers. The goal of this study is to explore follower’s implicit
followership theories (IFTs) which entail an analysis of follower’s views and
perception about followership. For this purpose, based on a phenomenological
approach, semi-structured interviews with employees of large public and private
organizations, in Mashhad were analyzed by exploratory content analysis. A total of
25 categories of implicit theories were detected in 5 prototypes and 5 antiprototypes.
Followership prototypes consist of constructive perception of work, job
competencies, mighty arm of leader, moral virtues and initiation pattern; five antiprototypes
were named as role deviances including destructive behaviors,
obedience, incompetency, indifference and blue color. Reflecting on the findings, a
5 dimensional model was identified, with each dimension having its prototypes and
anti- prototypes. Results showed that follower's IFTs differ from leader's follower's
implicit followership theories.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Article Title [Persian]

کشف نظریه‌های ضمنی پیروی پیروان با استفاده از رویکرد کیفی در سازمان‌های بزرگ شهر مشهد

Authors [Persian]

  • زهرا محمدزاده 1
  • سعید مرتضوی 2
  • محمد لگزیان 2
  • فریبرز رحیم نیا 2
1 دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد و مؤسسه آموزش عالی بینالود، مشهد، ایران
2 دانشکدة علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
Abstract [Persian]

پیروی پارادایم رو به رشدی در رفتار سازمانی به شمار می‌رود که به جای تمرکز صرف بر رهبری، پیروان را کانون توجه خود قرارمی‌دهد. کشف دیدگاه‌های پیروان به نقش خودشان که با عنوان نظریه‌های ضمنی پیروی پیروان شناخته می‌شود، هدف مقاله است. برای این منظور براساس رویکرد پدیدارشناسی، مصاحبه‌هایی نیمه‌ساختاریافته با کارکنانی از صنایع مختلف سازمان‌های بزرگ دولتی و خصوصی شهر مشهد انجام و با روش تحلیل محتوا تجزیه و تحلیل شد. 25 طبقه نظریه‌های ضمنی شناسایی شد که در پنج دستة ویژگی‌های مثبت و پنج دستة ویژگی‌های منفی قرارمی‌گیرد. مؤلفه‌های مثبت پیروی با عنوان ادراک سازنده از کار، شایستگی شغلی، بازوی توانای رهبر، فضایل اخلاقی و الگوی پیشگامی طبقه‌بندی شد. پنج مؤلفة ویژگی‌های منفی نیز با عنوان نابهنجاری‌های نقش نامگذاری شد و شامل تخریب، تابعیت، بی‌کفایتی، بی‌تفاوتی و کاریدی بود. با تأمل در نتایج، می‌توان الگویی با پنج جهت‌گیری شناسایی کرد که هر بعد دارای وجه مثبت و وجه منفی است. به عبارت دیگر، برای هر بعد شناسایی شده، هم می‌توان الگوی پیروی خوب و هم الگوهای پیروی نامناسب تبیین کرد. 

Keywords [Persian]

  • پیروان
  • پیروی
  • تحلیل محتوا
  • نظریه‌های ضمنی
Agho, A. (2009). "Perspectives of senior-level executives on effective
followership and leadership". Journal of Leadership & Organizational
Studies. (16), 159-168.
Andreas, M. (2003)."Validity and reliability tests in case study research: a
literature review with hands-on applications for each research phase".
Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal. 6(2), 75-86.
Appelbaum, S.; Iaconi, G. & Matousek, A. (2007). "Positive and negative
deviant workplace, behaviors: causes, impacts, and solutions".
Corporate governance. 7(5), 586-598.
Baker, S. (2007). "Followership: theoretical foundations of a contemporary
construct". Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies. 14(1),
50–60.
Bennis, W. (2008). Introduction"in Riggio, R. Chaleff, I.Lipman- Blumen, J.
(eds). The art of followership: How Great Followers Create Great
Leaders and Organizations. Jossey-Bass publications, San Francisco.
Bennis, W. (1993). An advanced life reflections of leadership and change,
Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.
Berger, P. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A
treatise in the sociology of knowledge. NY: Doubleday.
Bligh, M. & Schyns, B. (2007). "The Romance Lives On: Contemporary
Issues Surrounding the Romance of Leadership". Leadership. 3(3),
343–360.
Bresnen, M. (1995). "All things to all people? Perceptions, attributions, and
constructions of leadership". Leadership Quarterly, 6(4), 495−513.
Brint, S. (1993). "Eliot Freidson's Contribution to the Sociology of
Professions". Work and Occupations. 20(259), 259- 278
Carsten, M; Uhl-Bien, M.; West, B; Patera, J. & McGregor, R. (2010).
"Exploring social constructions of followership: A qualitative study".
Leadership Quarterly. (21), 543–562.
Chaleff, I. (2008). Creating new ways of following. In Riggio, R; Chaleff,I;
Lipman- Blumen,J.(eds). The art of followership: How Great
Followers Create Great Leaders and Organizations. Jossey-Bass
publications, San Francisco.
Crossman, B & Crossman, J. (2011). "Conceptualizing followership: a
review of the literature". Leadership and Organization Development
Journal. 7(4), 481–497.
Cresswell, J. (2009). Research design, qualitative, quantitative and mixed
methods approaches. Sage publications, London.

Mc Gregor, D. (1966). Leadership and Leadership, MIT press, Boston.
Ekundayo, J. (2011). Toward a functional follower's model in organizational
leadership process. 9(2). Available at:
http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?docid=1533
7812-201101-201111280012-201111280012-185-193(June,23,2013)
Engle, E & Lord, R. (1997). "Implicit theories, self-schemas, and leader–
member exchange". Academy of Management Journal. (40), 988–
1010.
Epitropaki, O & Martin, R. (2005). "From ideal to real: A longitudinal study
of the role of IFTs on LMXs and employee outcomes". Journal of
Applied Psychology. (90), 659–676.
Favara, L. (2009). Examining followership styles and their relationship with
job satisfaction and performance. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis in north
central University, Arizona.
Gils, S; Quaquebeke, N. & Knippenberg, D. (2010). "The X-factor: On the
relevance of implicit leadership and followership theories for LMX".
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 19(3),
333-363.
Given, L. (ed.) (2008). Encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Sage
publications, California.
Goodwin, V.; Wofford, J. & Boyd, N. (2000). "A laboratory experiment
testing the antecedents of leader cognitions". Journal of
Organizational Behavior. (21), 769–788.
Griffin, R. & Lopez, Y. (2005). "Bad Behavior in Organizations: A review
and typology for future research". Journal of Management, 31(6),
988-1005.
Howel, j & Mendez, M. (2008). Three perspectives on followership in
Riggio, R. Chaleff, I. Lipman- Blumen, J. (eds). The art of
followership: How Great Followers Create Great Leaders and
Organizations. Jossey-Bass publications, San Francisco.
Epitropaki, O; Sy, T; Martin, R; Tram-Quon, S. & Topakas, A. (2013).
"Implicit Leadership and Followership Theories “in the wild”: Taking
stock of information-processing approaches to leadership and
followership in organizational settings". Leadership Quarterly, (24),
858–881.
Hewes, R. (2014) Top Ten Traits of Great Leaders. Available online at:
http://www.amanet.org/training/articles/Top-Ten-Traits-of-Great-
Leaders.aspx (last seen on 2014/ 20/ 8).
Insch, G; Moore, E. & Murphy, L. (1997). "Content analysis in leadership
research: examples, procedures, and suggestions for future use".

Leadership Quarterly. 8(1), 1-25.
Johannessen, J. (1991). "The holographic organization, a design model".
Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal. 22(1), 41-55.
Kellerman, B. (2008). Followership: How Followers are Creating Change
and Changing Leaders. Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston.
Kelley, R. (1992). The Power of Followership. Doubleday, New York.
Meindl, J. (1995). "The romance of leadership as a follower centric theory: a
social construction approach". Leadership Quarterly, 6(3), 329-341.
Mintzberg, H. (1975). "The manager’s job: folklore and fact". Harvard
business review. 5(4), 49-61.
McShane, S. & VonGlinow, M. (2010). Organizational behavior: emerging
knowledge and practice for the real world (5th ed.). Mc Grow Hill
press.
Newman, L. (2007). Basics of social research, qualitative and quantitative
approaches. (2nd edition). Pearson Education Inc.
Roberts, p. (2006). "Reliability and Validity in research". Nursing Standard,
41-25.
Sy, T. (2010). "What do you think of followers? Examining the content,
structure, and consequences of IFT". Organizational Behavior and
Human Decision Processes. (113), 73–84.
Steger, J; Manners, G; Zimmerman, T. (1982). "Following the leader: How
to link management style to subordinate personalities". Management
Review. 82(10), 22–28.
Stech, E. (2008). A new leadership-followership paradigm in Riggio, R;
Chaleff, I; Lipman- Blumen, J. (eds). The art of followership: How
Great Followers Create Great Leaders and Organizations. Jossey-
Bass publications, San Francisco.
Thody, A. (2000). "Followership or Followersheep? An Exploration of the
Values of Non-Leaders". Management in Education. (14), 15-20.
Thody, A. (2003). "Followership in educational organizations: A pilot
mapping of the territory". Leadership and Policy in Schools. (2), 141–
156.
Turnley, W; Feldman, D. (1999). "The impact of psychological contract
violations on exit, voice and neglect". Human Relations. 52(7), 895-
913.
Uhl-Bien, M. & Pillai, R. (2006). The Romance of Leadership and the Social
Construction of Followership, in Shamir, B; Pillai, R; Bligh, M; Uhl-
Bien, M. (eds.) Follower-centered Perspectives on Leadership: A
Tribute to the Memory of James R. Meindl. Information Age 

Publishing, Greenwich.
Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Yukl, G. (2003). Leadership in Organizations. Available at:
http://management-class-global.com/organisation/tutorials/randdleaders-
business-yukl.pdf. (last seen on 2014/ 20/ 8).
Yukl, G. & Falbe, C. (1990). "Influence tactics and objectives in upward,
downward and lateral influence attempts". Journal of applied
psychology. 72(2), 132- 140.