Extending and Ranking the Audit Judgment Factors in an Emerging Market With an Emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

The current study investigated whether the cognitive neuroscience dimension affects auditors’ judgment in an increasingly competitive emerging audit market. In addition, other influential dimensions, including “identity characteristics,” “biological characteristics and moral values and spirituality,” and “environment” were also considered. The research was a descriptive survey, and the statistical population consisted of independent auditors. The field survey and questionnaire were used for data collection. The results generally showed that the cognitive neuroscience dimension affects auditors’ judgment positively. Among the examined factors, “the auditor’s selectivity about which problems to solve,” “the auditor’s level of attention,” and “the level of concentration” were the most important factors. In addition, other investigated dimensions, including “identity characteristics,” “biological characteristics and moral values and spirituality,” and “environment,” were considered influential factors. The findings imply that different neuroscience factors that require more research in this area affect auditors’ judgment and performance. Studying cognitive neuroscience factors as a novel stance to the audit literature can help auditors improve their professional judgments and opinions, resulting in reduced audit risk and increased audit quality. It can also help develop a new era in interdisciplinary studies via associating decision-making with cognitive theories and implementing neuroscience related technologies.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Aida, N. (2021). Work experience, obedience pressure and task complexity on audit judgment. Golden Ratio of Auditing Research1(2), 61-69.
American Psychiatric Association, D., & American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5 (Vol. 5, No. 5). Washington, DC: American psychiatric association.
Añaña, E. D. S., & Nique, W. M. (2007). A professional category positioning: The role of personal values and their influence on consumer perceptions. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management14(4), 289-296.
American Psychological Association (2007). American Dictionary of Psychology.
Aquino, K., & Reed II, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of personality and social psychology83(6), 1423-1440
Arnold, D. F., Bernardi, R. A., & Neidermeyer, P. E. (2009). Do European auditors’ decisions reflect harmony? The impact of country and culture. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance6(1), 58-68.
Arrami, N., & QingXiang, Y. (2021). The role of moral identity in auditor’s ethical decision making. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science10(2), 157-169.
Arrami, N., & QingXiang, Y. (2022). Impact of ethical training on auditors’ ethical decision making in Morocco. Studia Universitatis Vasile Goldiș Arad, Seria Științe Economice32(2), 41-64.
Bagherpour, M., Monroe, G., & G. Shailer, G. (2014). Government and managerial influence on auditor switching under partial privatization. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(4), 372-390
Bagherpour Velashani, M. A., Saei, M. J., Meshkani, A., & Bagheri, M. (2013). Prediction of independent auditor opinion in Iran: data mining approach. Accounting and Auditing Research, 22(1), 21-35.
Balkir, I. H. (2000). Effects of analytical review results, optimism and patterns-for-coping on audit effort of accounting estimates [unpublished Doctoral dissertation]. Concordia University.
Bauer, T. D. (2014). The effects of client identity strength and professional identity salience on auditor judgments. The Accounting Review90(1), 95-114.
Bhattacharjee, S., Maletta, M. J., & Moreno, K. K. (2017). Audit reviewers’ judgments in multiple client audit environments. Behavioral Research in Accounting29(2), 1-9.
Bodley, J. H. (2011). Cultural anthropology: Tribes, states, and the global system. Rowman Altamira.
Boone, W., & Piccinini, G. (2016). The cognitive neuroscience revolution. Synthese193(5), 1509-1534.
Bucaro, A. C. (2019). Enhancing auditors’ critical thinking in audits of complex estimates. Accounting, Organizations and Society73, 35-49.
Carvalho Júnior, C. V. D. O., Cornacchione, E., Rocha, A. F. D., & Rocha, F. T. (2017). Cognitive brain mapping of auditors and accountants in going concern judgments. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças28 (73), 132-147.
Commerford, B. P., Hatfield, R. C., & Houston, R. W. (2018). The effect of real earnings management on auditor scrutiny of management’s other financial reporting decisions. The Accounting Review93(5), 145-163.
Cooper, R. P., & Shallice, T. (2010). Cognitive neuroscience: The troubled marriage of cognitive science and neuroscience. Topics in Cognitive Science2(3), 398-406.
Cowperthwaite, P. (2010). Culture matters: How our culture affects the audit. Accounting Perspectives9(3), 175-215.
CPA Canada. (2019). CPA Canada handbook – assurance: Canadian auditing standards (CAS). CAS 230, audit documentation.
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. Avon.
De Soir, E., Van den Steene, P., & Daubechies, F. (2007). Stress en trauma bij de politie. Maklu.
Deckers, L. (2018). Motivation: Biological, psychological, and environmental. Routledge Press.
Dekkers, T. J., de Water, E., & Scheres, A. (2022). Impulsive and risky decision-making in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): The need for a developmental perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology44, 330-336.
Deliu, D. (2020). Elevating Professional Reasoning in Auditing. Psycho-Professional Factors Affecting Auditor’s Professional Judgement and Skepticism. Journal of Accounting and Auditing: Research and Practice, 1-17.
Demetriou, E. A., Park, S. H., Pepper, K. L., Naismith, S. L., Song, Y. J., Thomas, E. E. Hickie, I.B & Guastella, A. J. (2021). A transdiagnostic examination of anxiety and stress on executive function outcomes in disorders with social impairment. Journal of Affective Disorders281, 695-707.
Dewi, I. G. A. A. P., & Dewi, P. P. (2018). Big Five personality, ethical sensitivity, and performance of auditors. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences5(2), 195-209.
Dewi, N. P. S., Muliartini, N. K. K., & Rustiarini, N. W. (2021). Audit judgment with emotional intelligence as moderation variable in BPKP Bali. AFEBI Accounting Review6(1), 20-31.
DeZoort, T., Harrison, P., & Taylor, M. (2006). Accountability and auditors’ materiality judgments: The effects of differential pressure strength on conservatism, variability, and effort. Accounting, Organizations and Society31(4-5), 373-390.
Drost, R. (2013). Memory and decision making: Determining action when the sirens sound. Weather, Climate, and Society5(1), 43-54.
Efraim, T., Jay, E. A., Liang, T. P., & McCarthy, R. V. (2005). Decision support systems and intelligent systems. Andi.
Feng, Y., Guo, X., & Li, H. (2020). Does the Corporate Governance Status and Its Changes Affect the Auditor’s Major Misstatement Risk Judgment?. In IEIS2019: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Industrial Economics System and Industrial Security Engineering (pp. 193-209). Springer Singapore.
Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making13(1), 1-17.
Fischhoff, B., & Broomell, S. B. (2020). Judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology71, 331-355.
Forgionne, G., & Newman, J. (2007). An experiment on the effectiveness of creativity enhancing decision-making support systems. Decision Support Systems42(4), 2126-2136.
Gaynor, L. M., Kelton, A. S., Mercer, M., & Yohn, T. L. (2016). Understanding the relation between financial reporting quality and audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory35(4), 1-22.
Gonzalez, C., & Mehlhorn, K. (2016). Framing from experience: Cognitive processes and predictions of risky choice. Cognitive science40(5), 1163-1191.
Gorton, K. L., & Hayes, J. (2014). Challenges of assessing critical thinking and clinical judgment in nurse practitioner students. Journal of Nursing Education53(3), S26-S29.
Gozé, T., Moskalewicz, M., Schwartz, M. A., Naudin, J., Micoulaud-Franchi, J. A., & Cermolacce, M. (2019). Reassessing “praecox feeling” in diagnostic decision making in schizophrenia: A critical review. Schizophrenia Bulletin45(5), 966-970.
Griffith, E. E., Kadous, K., & Young, D. (2021). Improving complex audit judgments: A framework and evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research38(3), 2071-2104.
Gur, R. C., Erwin, R. J., Gur, R. E., Zwil, A. S., Heimberg, C., & Kraemer, H. C. (1992). Facial emotion discrimination: II. Behavioral findings in depression. Psychiatry Research42(3), 241-251.
Hartley, C. A., & Phelps, E. A. (2012). Anxiety and decision-making. Biological Psychiatry72(2), 113-118.
Hertwig, R., & Pleskac, T. J. (2010). Decisions from experience: Why small samples? Cognition115(2), 225-237.
Hicks, F. D., Merritt, S. L., & Elstein, A. S. (2003). Critical thinking and clinical decision making in critical care nursing: A pilot study. Heart & Lung32(3), 169-180.
Hosseini, M., & Hosseini, H. (2011). Ethics of critical thinking. Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz5(8), 1-13.
Hurtt, R. K. (2010). Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory29(1), 149-171.
Huys, Q. J., Guitart-Masip, M., Dolan, R. J., & Dayan, P. (2015). Decision-theoretic psychiatry. Clinical Psychological Science3(3), 400-421.
IFAC. (2009). International auditing and assurance standards board (IAASB), ISA 200, overall objectives of the independent auditor and the conduct of an audit in accordance with international standards on auditing. www.ifac.org/system/files/downloads/a008- 2010-iaasb-handbook-isa-200.pdf
Iskandar, T. M., Sari, R. N., Mohd‐Sanusi, Z., & Anugerah, R. (2012). Enhancing auditors’ performance: The importance of motivational factors and the mediation effect of effort. Managerial Auditing Journal, 27(5), 462-476.
Ju, U., Kang, J., & Wallraven, C. (2019). To brake or not to brake? Personality traits predict decision-making in an accident situation. Frontiers in Psychology10, 134.
Kampylis, P. G., & Valtanen, J. (2010). Redefining creativity—Analyzing definitions, collocations, and consequences. The Journal of Creative Behavior44(3), 191-214.
Kim, S., Kim, T., Pae, S., & Kim, S. (2018). Audit fees via an indirect payment channel and professional skepticism. Managerial Auditing Journal, 3(5), 517-534.
Kirkos, E., Spathis, C., Nanopoulos, A., & Manolopoulos, Y. (2008). Identifying qualified auditors’ opinions: A data mining approach. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting4(1), 183-197.
Lehmann, C. M., & Norman, C. S. (2006). The effects of experience on complex problem representation and judgment in auditing: An experimental investigation. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 18(1), 65-83.
Libby, R., & Luft, J. (1993). Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: Ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society18(5), 425-450.
Little, R. E. (2016). The impact of client and auditor gender on auditors’ judgments: A replication and extension.
Mahdavi, G., & Daryaei, A. A. (2016). Attitude toward auditing, marketing and corporate governance (An examination based in Parsons’ social action theory). International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility1(1), 1-16.
Marx, S. M., Weber, E. U., Orlove, B. S., Leiserowitz, A., Krantz, D. H., Roncoli, C., & Phillips, J. (2007). Communication and mental processes: Experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information. Global Environmental Change17(1), 47-58.
Maslow, A.H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-96.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346. hdl:10983/23610 – via psychclassics.yorku.ca.
May, J., Workman, C., Han, H., & Haas, J. (2020). The neuroscience of moral judgment: Empirical and philosophical developments. 1-23
McKnight, C. A., & Wright, W. F. (2011). Characteristics of relatively high-performance auditors. Auditing: A Journal of practice & theory, 30(1), 191-206.
Min, J. H., & Jeong, C. (2009). A binary classification method for bankruptcy prediction. Expert Systems with Applications36(3), 5256-5263.
MohammadRezaei, F., & Mohd-Saleh, N. (2017). Auditor switching and audit fee discounting: The Iranian experience. Asian Review of Accounting,25(3). 335-360.
Mormann, M., & Russo, J. E. (2021). Does attention increase the value of choice alternatives? Trends in cognitive sciences,  25(4), 305-315.
Munyon, T. P., Summers, J. K., Thompson, K. M., & Ferris, G. R. (2015). Political skill and work outcomes: A theoretical extension, meta‐analytic investigation, and agenda for the future. Personnel Psychology68(1), 143-184.
Muttanachai, S. (2020). Factors influencing key audit matters reporting in Thailand. Asian Journal of Accounting Perspectives13(1), 26-39.
Naslmosavi, S. (2015). The effect of ethics on auditor’s judgment in ethical dilemma conditions: Evidence from Iranian auditors. Available at SSRN 2584308.
Nolder, C., & Riley, T. J. (2014). Effects of differences in national culture on auditors’ judgments and decisions: A literature review of cross-cultural auditing studies from a judgment and decision making perspective. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory33(2), 141-164.
Noppe, J., Ledegen, E., & Verhage, A. (2016). Welke rol spelen angst en stress bij politiemensen in gevaarsituaties? In Handboek politiediensten (Vol. 115, pp. 1-20). Kluwer.
Oken, B. S., Salinsky, M. C., & Elsas, S. (2006). Vigilance, alertness, or sustained attention: physiological basis and measurement. Clinical Neurophysiology117(9), 1885-1901.
Olsen, C., & Gold, A. (2018). Future research directions at the intersection between cognitive neuroscience research and auditors’ professional skepticism. Journal of Accounting Literature, 41,127-141
Opara, I., Weser, V., Sands, B., Fernandes, C. S. F., Hussett-Richardson, S., & Hieftje, K. (2022). Feeling invisible and unheard: A qualitative exploration of gendered-racist stereotypes influence on sexual decision making and mistreatment of black teen girls. Youth & Society, 54(4), 527-546.
Peytcheva, M., & Gillett, P. R. (2011). How partners’ views influence auditor judgment. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory30(4), 285-301.
Pillar, B. (April 7, 2005). Audit quality in the 21st century. Presentation at University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign.
Pissarra, J., & Jesuino, J. C. (2005). Idea generation through computer‐mediated communication: The effects of anonymity. Journal of Managerial Psychology20(3/4), 275-291.
Plassmann, H., Venkatraman, V., Huettel, S., & Yoon, C. (2015). Consumer neuroscience: Applications, challenges, and possible solutions. Journal of Marketing Research52(4), 427-435.
Popova, V. (2013). Exploration of skepticism, client‐specific experiences, and audit judgments. Managerial Auditing Journal,28(2), 140-160.
Praditaningrum, A. S., & Januarti, I. (2012). Analisis faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh terhadap audit judgment (Studi Pada BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Jawa Tengah) [Simposium Nasional Akuntansi] [unpublished Doctoral dissertation]. Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis.
Previtali, P., & Cerchiello, P. (2018). The determinants of whistleblowing in public administrations: An analysis conducted in Italian health organizations, universities, and municipalities. Public Management Review, 11(20), 1-21.
Quadackers, L., Groot, T., & Wright, A. (2014). Auditors’ professional skepticism: Neutrality versus presumptive doubt. Contemporary Accounting Research31(3), 639-657.
Rathbun, M. C., & Ruth-Sahd, L. A. (2009). Algorithmic tools for interpreting vital signs. Journal of Nursing Education48(7), 395-400.
Rees, J., & Koehler, G. (1999, January). Brainstorming, negotiating and learning in group decision support systems: an evolutionary approach. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers (pp. 9-pp). IEEE.
Ruff, C. C., & Huettel, S. A. (2014). Experimental methods in cognitive neuroscience. In Neuroeconomics (Eds.), Neuroeconomics (2nd ed.). 77-108
Saadullah, S. M., & Bailey, C. D. (2014). The “big five personality traits” and accountants’ ethical intention formation. In Research on professional responsibility and ethics in accounting. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.???safe
Salehi, M., & Dastanpoor, Z. (2021). The effects of psychological factors on the performance of independent auditors in Iran. Current Psychology40(4), 1621-1630.
Sallal, F., Bagherpour Velashani, M.A., & Saei, M.J. (2021). Fraudulent financial reporting motivations in emerging markets. Journal of Financial Crime. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-09-2020-0188\
Saputra, K. A. K., & Kawisana, P. G. W. P. (2021). Analysis of the influence of power, auditor experience and task complexity on audit judgment. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology18(4), 6370-6379.
Shafer, W. E., Ketchand, A. A., & Morris, R. E. (2004). Auditors’ willingness to advocate client-preferred accounting principles. Journal of Business Ethics52(3), 213-227.
Sila, M., Subroto, B., Baridwan, Z., & Rahman, A. F. (2015). The effect of knowledge and experience on professional auditor’s judgment: Study on state auditor in Indonesia. International Journal of Management and Administrative Sciences journal of Management and Administrative Sciences3(10), 98-106.
Smelser, N. J., & Baltes, P. B. (Eds.). (2001). International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (Vol. 11). Elsevier.
Shanteau, J. (1987). Psychological characteristics of expert decision makers. In Expert judgment and expert systems (pp. 289-304). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Soleymani, S. M., Dehdar, F., & Abdoli, M. (2022). Choosing influential dimension of mindfulness of auditors’ professional judgments based on social pressure: An analysis based on rough theory. Iranian Journal of Finance6(2), 135-166.
Spector, P. E. (1987). Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem? Journal of Applied Psychology72(3), 438-443
Swaminathan, A., & Rathnasabapathy, M. (2021). Role of creativity in problem solving–A review. Review of International Geographical Education Online11(8), 1359-1367.
Tan, H. T., Ng, T. B. P., & Mak, B. W. Y. (2002). The effects of task complexity on auditors’ performance: The impact of accountability and knowledge. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory21(2), 81-95.
Tandean, J. (2022). Pengaruh self-efficacy, time budget pressure dan pengalaman audit terhadap audit judgment dengan kompleksitas tugas sebagai variabel moderating [Universitas Hasanuddin] [unpublished Doctoral dissertation]. Universitas Hasanuddin.
Hofstede Centre report. (2016). Country comparison. Retrieved from: https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison
Thompson, C., & Stapley, S. (2011). Do educational interventions improve nurses’ clinical decision making and judgement? A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies48(7), 881-893.
Trotman, K. T. (2006). Professional judgment: Are auditors being held to a higher standard than other professionals? The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia.
Tsunogaya, N., Sugahara, S., & Chand, P. (2017). The impact of social influence pressures, commitment, and personality on judgments by auditors: Evidence from Japan. Journal of International Accounting Research16(3), 17-34.
Vasconcelos, A. F. (2021). Individual spiritual capital: Meaning, a conceptual framework and implications. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 13(1), 117-141.
Verhage, A., Noppe, J., Feys, Y., & Ledegen, E. (2018). Force, stress, and decision-making within the Belgian police: The impact of stressful situations on police decision-making. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology33(4), 345-357.
Vettorello, M., Eisenbart, B., & Ranscombe, C. (2019, July). Toward better design-related decision making: A proposal of an advanced OODA loop. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 2387-2396). Cambridge University Press.
Waller, W. S. (1989). The auditors assessment of the competence and integrity of auditee personnel-discussion. Auditing – A Journal of Practice & Theory8, 17-21.
Wedemeyer, D (2010). A discussion of auditor judgment as the critical component in audit quality: A practitioner’s perspective. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 7(4), 320–333.
Wills, M. E. (2014). Introduction to middle range nursing theories. M. McEwen, & E. Wills, Theoretical basis for nursing, 213-228.
Yang, L., Brink, A. G., & Wier, B. (2018). The impact of emotional intelligence on auditor judgment. International Journal of Auditing22(1), 83-97.
Zavei, S. J. A. P., & Jusan, M. M. (2012). Exploring housing attributes selection based on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences42, 311-319.
Zureigat, Q. M. (2015). Factors Associated with Audit Reports in Saudi Arabia. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 14(D5), 67-74.
Francis, J. R. (2004). What do we know about audit quality?. The British accounting review36(4), 345-368.