Multi-Period Efficiency Analysis with Flexible Measures: Oriented and Non-Oriented Approaches

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Mathematics, Lahijan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran

2 Department of Applied Mathematics, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran

Abstract

In traditional data envelopment analysis (DEA) models, the relative efficiency of decision making units (DMUs) is usually evaluated in a particular period of time such that the status of each measure from the input or output viewpoint is certain. However, in many applications, the performance of organizations should be measured over multiple periods of time while the status of some factors called “flexible measures” from the perspective of input or output is uncertain. The purpose of this study is to propose approaches to evaluate the efficiency of the multi-period systems where flexible measures are presented. For this reason, oriented and non-oriented DEA-based approaches from the standpoints of individual DMU and aggregate efficiencies are rendered to measure the overall and period efficiency of multi-period systems with flexible measures. Also, efficiency changes between two periods are estimated using the Malmquist productivity index (MPI). A dataset is provided to validate the proposed approach.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abolghasem, S., Toloo, M., & Amézquita, S. (2019). Cross-efficiency evaluation in the presence of flexible measures with an application to healthcare systems. Health Care Management Science, 22(3), 512-533. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-019-09478-0
Alizadeh Afrouzi, M. (2020). The Malmquist productivity index with the flexible variables. Journal of Operational Research and Its Applications, 17 (4), 89-98. (In Persian)
Amirteimoori, A., & Emrouznejad, A. (2011). Flexible measures in production process: A DEA-based approach. RAIRO-Operations Research, 45(01), 63-74.
Amirteimoori, A., Emrouznejad, A., & Khoshandam, L. (2013). Classifying flexible measures in data envelopment analysis: A slack-based measure. Measurement, 46(10), 4100-4107.
Amirteimoori, H., Amirteimoori, A., & Amirteimoori, A. (2020). Sustainability assessment in the presence of undesirable factors over time: A case on gas companies. Expert Systems, 37(3), e12316. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12316
Banker, R. D. (1984). Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. European journal of operational research, 17(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(84)90006-7
Bansal, P., & Mehra, A. (2018). Multi-period additive efficiency measurement in data envelopment analysis with non-positive and undesirable data. OPSEARCH, 55(3), 642-661. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-018-0343-z
Beasley, J. E. (1990). Comparing university departments. Omega, 18(2), 171-183.
Boďa, M. (2020). Classifying flexible measures in data envelopment analysis: A slacks-based measure – A comment. Measurement, 150, 107045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107045
Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., & Diewert, W. E. (1982). The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica, 50(6), 1393-1414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1913388
Charnes, A., Clark, C. T., Cooper, W. W., & Golany, B. (1985). A developmental study of data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in the US air forces. Annals of Operations Research, 2(1),  95-112.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444. //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0377221778901388
Chen, W.-C. (2014). Revisiting dual-role factors in data envelopment analysis: Derivation and implications. IIE Transactions, 46(7), 653-663.
Cook, W. D., & Seiford, L. M. (2009). Data envelopment analysis (DEA) – Thirty years on. European Journal of Operational Research, 192(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.032
Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2007). Classifying inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 180(2), 692-699.
Ebrahimi, B., & Hajizadeh, E. (2021). A novel DEA model for solving performance measurement problems with flexible measures: An application to Tehran Stock Exchange. Measurement, 179, 109444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109444
Esfidani, S., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Razavyan, S., & Ebrahimnejad, A. (2020). A slacks-based measure approach for efficiency decomposition in multi-period two-stage systems. RAIRO-Oper. Res., 54(6), 1657-1671. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2019113
Esmaeilzadeh, A., & Hadi-Vencheh, A. (2013). A super-efficiency model for measuring aggregative efficiency of multi-period production systems. Measurement, 46(10), 3988-3993. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.07.023
Fare, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1996). Intertemporal production frontiers with dynamic DEA. Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhang, Z. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. The American Economic Review, 84(1), 66-83. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2117971
Jablonsky, J. (2016). Efficiency analysis in multi-period systems: an application to performance evaluation in Czech higher education. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 24(2), 283-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10100-015-0401-z
Jahani Sayyad Noveiri, M., & Kordrostami, S. (2019). Multi-period sustainability performance in the presence of discrete and bounded measures. International Journal of Industrial Engineering & Production Research, 30, 507-528.
Jahani Sayyad Noveiri, M., Kordrostami, S., & Amirteimoori, A. (2018). Detecting the multi-period performance and efficiency changes of systems with undesirable outputs. Discrete Mathematics, Algorithms and Applications, 10(03), 1850034. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793830918500349
Jahani Sayyad Noveiri, M., Kordrostami, S., & Amirteimoori, A. (2019). An alternative DEA approach for evaluating the system efficiency in the presence of dual-role factors. 26(2). https://journals.sfu.ca/ijietap/index.php/ijie/article/view/3119
Jahani Sayyad Noveiri, M., Kordrostami, S., & Amirteimoori, A. (2020). Efficiency evaluation of closed-loop supply chains with proportional dual-role measures. Kybernetika, 56(4), 695-721. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14736/kyb-2020-4-0695
Joulaei, M., Mirbolouki, M., & Bagherzadeh-Valami, H. (2019). Classifying fuzzy flexible measures in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 36, 3791-3800. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-18698
Kao, C., & Hwang, S.-N. (2014). Multi-period efficiency and Malmquist productivity index in two-stage production systems. European journal of operational research, 232(3), 512-521. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.07.030
Kao, C., & Liu, S.-T. (2014). Multi-period efficiency measurement in data envelopment analysis: The case of Taiwanese commercial banks. Omega, 47, 90-98. //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048313000881
Kordrostami, S., & Jahani Sayyad Noveiri, M. (2012). Evaluating the efficiency of decision making units in the presence of flexible and negative data. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 5(12), 3776-3782.
Kordrostami, S., & Jahani Sayyad Noveiri, M. (2014). Evaluating the performance and classifying the interval data in data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 9(4), 243-248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2014.900655
Kordrostami, S., & Jahani Sayyad Noveiri, M. (2017). Evaluating the efficiency of firms with negative data in multi-period systems: An application to bank data. International Journal of Industrial Mathematics, 9(1), 27-35.
Kordrostami, S., & Jahani Sayyad Noveiri, M. (2017). Evaluating the multi-period systems efficiency in the presence of fuzzy data. Fuzzy Information and Engineering, 9(3), 281-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fiae.2017.09.003
Kordrostami, S., & Jahani Sayyad Noveiri, M. (2021). Performance analysis in the presence of bounded, discrete and flexible measures. Operations Research and Decisions, 31(3), 41-65.
Kordrostami, S., Amirteimoori, A., & Jahani Sayyad Noveiri, M. (2019). Inputs and outputs classification in integer-valued data envelopment analysis. Measurement, 139, 317-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.02.087
Kordrostami, S., Farajpour‎, G., & Jahani Sayyad Noveiri, M. (2014). Evaluating the efficiency and classifying the fuzzy data: A DEA based ‎approach. International Journal of Industrial Mathematics, 6(4), 321-327. http://ijim.srbiau.ac.ir/article_4836_991280d1e4d3b379ff0af4d6a82e4339.pdf
Kuah, C. T., & Wong, K. Y. (2011). Efficiency assessment of universities through data envelopment analysis. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 499-506.
Liu, D. (2017). Evaluating the multi-period efficiency of East Asia airport companies. Journal of Air Transport Management, 59, 71-82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.11.009
Liu, S.T. (2016). Multi-period efficiency measurement with fuzzy Data and weight restrictions. In Handbook of Operations Analytics Using Data Envelopment Analysis (pp. 89-111). Springer.
Nemoto, J., & Goto, M. (1999). Dynamic data envelopment analysis: modeling intertemporal behavior of a firm in the presence of productive inefficiencies. Economics Letters, 64(1), 51-56.
Park, K. S., & Park, K. (2009). Measurement of multiperiod aggregative efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 193(2), 567-580. //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722170701123X
Pastor, J. T., & Lovell, C. A. K. (2005). A global Malmquist productivity index. Economics Letters, 88(2), 266-271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2005.02.013
Razavi Hajiagha, S. H., Hashemi, S. S., Amoozad Mahdiraji, H., & Azaddel, J. (2015). Multi-period data envelopment analysis based on Chebyshev inequality bounds. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(21), 7759-7767. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.06.008
Sedighi Hassan Kiyadeh, M., Saati, S., & Kordrostami, S. (2019). Improvement of models for determination of flexible factor type in data envelopment analysis. Measurement, 137, 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.01.042
Tajeddini, K. (2015). Exploring the antecedents of effectiveness and efficiency. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 49, 125-135.
Tavana, M., Izadikhah, M., Toloo, M., & Roostaee, R. (2021). A new non-radial directional distance model for data envelopment analysis problems with negative and flexible measures. Omega, 102, 102355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2020.102355
Tavana, M., Khalili-Damghani, K., Santos Arteaga, F. J., & Hosseini, A. (2019). A fuzzy multi-objective multi-period network DEA model for efficiency measurement in oil refineries. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135, 143-155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.05.033
Tohidi, G., & Matroud, F. (2017). A new non-oriented model for classifying flexible measures in DEA. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(9), 1019-1029. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-017-0207-6
Toloo, M. (2012). Alternative solutions for classifying inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 63(6), 1104-1110.
Toloo, M. (2014). Notes on classifying inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis: A comment. European Journal of Operational Research, 235(3), 810-812.
Toloo, M., Allahyar, M., & Hančlová, J. (2018). A non-radial directional distance method on classifying inputs and outputs in DEA: Application to banking industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 92, 495-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.09.034
Wang, X., Hu, H., & Wei, Y. (2022). Multi-period two-stage DEA model: Measuring performance of integrated production and service systems in Chinese cable TV industry. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 60(3), 385-406.